Problems with carbon dating answers in genesis
Problems with carbon dating answers in genesis - dating sites in calgary canada
This process moves at about an inch or two per year, so the average age of the ocean floor is in fact a few tens of millions of years, and thus the result is completely consistent with old-Earth science.
So this may be the closest creationists get to actual science, not actually doing science, just simply exploiting science that is not fully understood yet and claiming that to be evidence for their position.Tiscareno again:“[…] The evidence shows that the magnetic field has fluctuated back and forth in strength as well as direction.These fluctuations are clearly observed in places where the stratigraphy (i.e.Earlier this week they told us about the common myths about creationism that I had a fun time dissecting as not myths at all, and now they have presented us with, So I would like to take a look at these 10 pieces of evidence and explain why they could not be further from evidence for something as silly as young earth creationism.1.Very Little Sediment on the Seafloor Due to Plate Tectonics, ocean floor is continuously created at mid-ocean ridges and subducted into the Earth’s mantle at ocean trenches.As the hydrogen fuses, it should change the composition of the sun’s core, gradually increasing the sun’s temperature.
If true, this means that the earth was colder in the past.which rocks are older than which rocks) is obvious due to either layering or distance from a sea-floor spreading ridge.The decrease measured in the past few hundred years, therefore, is nothing more than a downward trend as part of an overall fluctuation, and has no implication for the age of the Earth.”6 Helium in Radioactive Rocks During the radioactive decay of uranium and thorium contained in rocks, lots of helium is produced.Not really, because evidence shows a fluctuation in the magnetic field, not a constant decay as Answers in Genesis is claiming.According to Talk Origins the concept itself was dreamed up by two creationists who often had to use divine intervention in their explanations for the for the magnetic decay they claimed to have found, and according to Matthew S.Creationists think you should see the layers of rock like those of a cake, all over the earth, and apparently if there is any bending, that is proof the earth is young. No one expects there to be an unbroken record of the earth as creationists are claiming must exist for the earth to be over 4 billion years old, so the claim they are making is very misleading from the start. Tiscareno again: Deposited layers can be later eroded away or destroyed in other ways, and drought can prevent layers from being deposited at all for long periods of time.